Symmetry between up and down quarks is more broken than expected

https://news.ycombinator.com/rss Hits: 12
Summary

NA61/SHINE’s lead-scintillator calorimeter. Credit: CERN In late 2023, Wojciech Brylinski was analyzing data from the NA61/SHINE collaboration at CERN for his thesis when he noticed an unexpected anomaly—a strikingly large imbalance between charged and neutral kaons in argon–scandium collisions. He found that, instead of being produced in roughly equal numbers, charged kaons were produced 18.4% more often than neutral kaons. This suggested that the so-called "isospin symmetry" between up and down quarks might be broken by more than expected due to the differences in their electric charges and masses—a discrepancy that existing theoretical models would struggle to explain. Known sources of isospin asymmetry only predict deviations of a few percent. "When Wojciech got started, we thought it would be a trivial verification of the symmetry," says Marek Gaździcki, who was spokesperson of NA61/SHINE at the time of the discovery. "We expected the symmetry to be closely obeyed—although we had previously measured these types of discrepancies at the NA49 experiment, they had large uncertainties and were not significant." Isospin symmetry is one facet of flavor symmetry, whereby the strong interaction treats all quark flavors identically. This means that all types of quarks should behave the same under the strong interaction, except for kinematic differences arising from their different masses. Isospin is not a symmetry of the electromagnetic interaction as up and down quarks have different electric charges. According to isospin symmetry, strong interactions in heavy-ion collisions should generate nearly equal amounts of charged kaons (comprising either an up quark and a strange antiquark or an up antiquark and a strange quark) and neutral kaons (comprising either a down quark and a strange antiquark or a down antiquark and a strange quark), given the similar masses of the up and down quarks. NA61/SHINE's data contradicts the hypothesis of equal yields with a 4.7σ significance...

First seen: 2025-03-31 14:42

Last seen: 2025-04-01 01:44